NewsLocal News

Actions

Tulsa judge denies Walters' motion for dismissal in Bixby defamation case

miller v walters
Posted
and last updated

OKLAHOMA CITY — A Tulsa judge ruled the lawsuit between State Superintendent Ryan Walters and Bixby Superintendent Rob Miller will proceed despite Walters' call for it to be dismissed.

Miller filed a defamation lawsuit on Aug. 15, asking for $75,000 in civil relief for libel and slander.

In a filing on Oct. 3, Watlers' lawyers called the lawsuit frivolous.

He filed the lawsuit after Walters called him a liar and a clown at a State Board of Education meeting after Miller questioned delays in funding for the school.

WATCH our coverage from that meeting:

Bixby Supt. raises questions about Title I funds, Walters calls him a 'liar'

This is Walters' full comment from the meeting.

“He’s a liar," said Walters. "I mean he’s truly a real embarrassment. He knows every year when he gets Title I funding… Same way it’s been every year, my team tells me for over a decade. He knows that. It’s been communicated to districts. Rob’s never reached out. Never indicated there was an issue, there’s not an issue. He made it up.”

The motion for dismissal says Miller is seeking damages for actions taken by Walters while "fulfilling his official duties as the elected State Superintendent."
Because of this, Walters' lawyers argue that Oklahoma's Government Tort Claims Act grants Walter immunity from the suit.

They also claim Walters was using his First Amendment rights and Miller can't prove the statements were made maliciously or with reckless disregard for the truth, which is required in a case like this against a public official.

"On its face, this suit is a transparent effort to punish Superintendent Walters for exercising his First Amendment rights," the motion reads.

Further, the lawyers say the Oklahoma Citizens Participation Act makes the case subject to expedited dismissal.

We contacted Superintendent Rob Miller for comment, but he referred us to his lawyer based on his counsel's advice.

"This is a typical motion that is filed in every defamation case," said Miller's lawyer. "Of course, we disagree with Defendant Walters' arguments and will be filing a response that will set forth our positions. We fully expect to defeat the motion and then proceed to jury trial."

The judge sided with Miller and his lawyer by allowing the lawsuit to move forward.

The decision said Miller has enough evidence on face value from the State Board of Education meeting to continue the lawsuit, highlighting Walters' comments about "all kinds of financial problems in [Miller's] district."

Miller also provided enough evidence to continue. The court also said it did not have sufficient evidence from the defendant to grant dismissal.

The court did note that Walter's issues may be brought back after further discovery of evidence, which is normal procedure.


Stay in touch with us anytime, anywhere --